A team requires a guiding principle when beginning to utilize automated tests.   Development of tests is very expensive in terms of development time and ongoing test maintenance that consume development time. One possibility for creating a testing strategy is to utilize defect reports to describe software use patterns.  The main objective is to create tests in a field that will bring the major crash for the buck, just like all software development.

Test Smart

When teams create tests built on reported defects many times the plan is to form a unit test for each defect. The main idea is when the team identifies a defect, they write a test for the predictable behavior and watch that fail. After this, they write a fix that results in a test to pass. This method will undeniably grow the test coverage and crop a test automation suite that can be utilized. Nevertheless, do have an idea that you have the best investment in writing automated tests?

Focus on Use

Comparable defect reports from clients frequently specify mutual usage of a feature that would benefit from automated tests.  For example, a rounding mistake in a 30-days report.  Even if there is extensive refactoring involved to create an automated test for this defect, due to usage there is reimbursement for the struggle.  Where a single case of a defect or defects found by the core quality team perhaps specifies a feature, not in substance use. Therefore, the same refactoring effort is not going to create a big impact on the entire code base.

Perceived Quality

Bearing in mind that just nearly 40 -60% of the code base is ever going to be utilized and that only 20 to 40 % is going to be utilized regularly, aiming your testing efforts in the maximum used portion of the code is going to result the prime return and meaningfully upsurge customer’s perception of the product quality.  Examining customer reported defects to produce strategies for adding test is one tool for creating outstanding quality code.